Legal Review of Land Measurement Errors in Land Registration in Wajo Regency
Keywords:
legal review, land measurement errors, land registrationAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that cause errors in land boundary measurements during the land registration process in Wajo Regency and to determine legal remedies for errors in land boundary measurements during the land registration process at the National Land Office of Wajo Regency. This study was conducted at the National Land Agency (BPN) of Wajo Regency using an empirical research approach with data collection through interviews so that the data obtained were analyzed comparatively and presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the main factors causing errors in land measurement occur due to the absence of land owners and bordering parties during the measurement, the lack of installation and maintenance of boundary markers, technical errors by surveyors, limited human resources and technology, and inefficient administrative procedures. Community unpreparedness and lack of education also exacerbate this situation. To overcome this problem, a comprehensive approach is needed through improving the service system, increasing technical capacity, and empowering communities to maintain and understand the boundaries of their land rights. Meanwhile, legal resolution efforts for errors in land boundary measurements during the land registration process at the National Land Agency Office in Wajo Regency can be carried out by referring to the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 3 of 2011, and other related regulations. Handling land ownership disputes due to errors in boundary determination, one of which is through the courts by revoking land certificates that are proven to have legal administrative defects. This revocation must be based on definite evidence. In addition to going through the courts, in resolving disputes, the applicant and related parties can be involved in finding a joint solution
References
Andi Dadi Mashuri, & Yustiana. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Secara Massal Swadaya Terhadap Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan. Legal Journal of Law, 1(2), 11–29. Diambil dari https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/26.
Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2022. Jakarta: BPN.
Brinker, C. Russel. (2000). Dasar-dasar Pengukuran Tanah. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Emirzon, Joni. (2001). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Umum.
Halim, Ridwan. (2003). Kesalahan Penetapan Batas Tanah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Harsono. Boedi. (1992). Hukum Agraria Indonesia (Himpunan Peraturan Hukum Tanah). Jakarta: Djambatan.
Hemanses, Rudolf. (2003). Sengketa Hak Milik Tanah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Irawan, Soerodjo. (2003). Kepastian Hukum Hak atas Tanah di Indonesia. Surabaya: Arloka.
Murad, Rusmadi. (1991). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Atas Tanah. Bandung: Alumni.
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geodesi. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Pengukuran Tanah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Puslitbang Geodesi.
Salle, Aminuddin dkk. (2010). Tujuan Pendaftaran Tanah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Santoso, Urip. (2008). Pendaftaran serta Peralihan Hak atas Tanah. Jakarta: Jurnal Media Hukum.
Silalahi, Ulber. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sulaeman Sagoni, Muharawati, Andi Wira Saputra, & Andi Wahyuddin Nur. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Sertifikat Tanah di Wilayah Pesisir Danau Tempe. Legal Journal of Law, 2(2), 107–118. Retrieved from https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/77.
Sulaeman Sagoni, Rahmi, & Sitti Hijrah. (2023). Efektivitas Hukum Terhadap Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Kelurahan Cina, Kecamatan Pammana, Kabupaten Wajo. Legal Journal of Law, 2(1), 79–90. Diambil dari https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/51
Sudjito. (1997). Prona Pensertifikatan Tanah secara Massal dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah yang bersifat Strategis. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Usman, Rachmadi. (2003). Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Bandung: Citra Aditya.
Yustiana, Andi Bau Mallarangeng, & Sulaeman Sagoni. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Kesalahan Penentuan Batas Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah di Kecamatan Lalabata Kabupaten Soppeng. Legal Journal of Law, 3(1), 69–80. Retrieved from https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/31
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



