Review of the ITE Law in conjunction with the Law on the Criminal Act of Transmitting Sexually Inappropriate Electronic Information via Social Media at the Wajo Police
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67032/ljl.v5i1.175Keywords:
ITE Law, electronic transmission, digital information, social mediaAbstract
This study aims to determine the application of the ITE Law in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 in handling the crime of transmitting electronic information containing sexual content through social media at the Wajo Police Station; and to determine the factors that influence the application of the ITE Law in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 in handling the crime of transmitting electronic information containing sexual content through social media at the Wajo Police Station. The data collection method used was interviews and library research. The data were analyzed qualitatively using deductive and inductive methods and then presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that the application of the ITE Law in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 in handling the crime of transmitting electronic information shows that it has been carried out procedurally and normatively, but is still faced with various substantive, structural, and cultural challenges; and the factors that influence the application of the ITE Law in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016. Law Number 19 of 2016 in handling the crime of transmitting sexually charged electronic information through social media at the Wajo Police Resort is influenced by factors such as legal substance, legal structure, legal culture, technical factors in proving ITE crimes, victim and perpetrator factors, and policy and law enforcement discretion.
References
Adami Chazawi. (2010). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Andi Hamzah. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
(2016). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Andi Sofyan & Nur Azisa. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press.
Arief Gosita. (1993). Masalah Korban Kejahatan. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
(2004). Masalah Perlindungan Anak. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. Academic Press.
Boyd, Danah M., & Ellison, Nicole B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chabrak, N., & Craig, R. (2013). Student Imaginings, Cognitive Dissonance and Critical Thinking. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.07.008.
Clift Johanes Richard Samsudin, dkk. (2018). Media Sosial dan Transformasi Komunikasi Digital. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
H.B. Vos. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Ishaq. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
J.E. Jonkers. (1987). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Jones, A. (2015). Cybercrime enforcement challenges. Journal of Cybersecurity, 1(1), 5-18.
Kaplan, Andreas M., & Haenlein, Michael. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1).
Kshetri, N. (2010). The global cybercrime industry and cybercrime policies. Journal of Global Information Management, 18(1), 67-91.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Lawrence M. Friedman. (1977). Law and Society: An Introduction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
(1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
(2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
(2018). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage publications.
Schravendijk & Wolters. (1985). Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudarto. (1986). Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Smith, B. (2019). Social media and cybercrime: A correlational study. Computers & Security, 87, 101573.
Taufik Hidayat. (2017). Pengaturan Pornografi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Teguh Prasetyo. (2019). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
